Activities

Blitzkrieg and Shoa, but also liberation, postwar rule of law, and democracy – were enabled by oil and chemical industries of hydrocarbons.

With the end of WW2, global petrochemical modernity entered a new, even more powerful phase. Wartime industries fuelled peacetime consumerism, European reconciliation – and ecological destruction.

Today, petromodern zombie warfare is back to Europe.

More, not less research on geochemopolitics of hydrocarbons with all its contradictions and ambivalences is necessary.

• 

• 

• 

The energy imaginary permeates ideological agendas, political projects, national myths, and mass media narratives, while visions of past and future energy inform public discourse, literature, and film, reflecting their historical and social underpinnings. This conference aims to map this evolving field of research by exploring the social and humanistic dimensions of energy, including fossil fuels, renewables, and nuclear power, and by examining the complex relationship between energy and the dynamics of war and peace

Additionally, the conference will feature two policy-oriented panels: one addressing the energy and climate agenda following the onset of the full-scale war in Ukraine in 2022, and the other examining the roles of scientists, experts, and activists in shaping and implementing energy transition policies and actions.

With (in oder of appearence): Oxana Timofeeva, Ilya Kalinin, Olaf Hamann, Alexander Klose, Gretchen Bakke, Darin Barney, Jeff Diamanti, Felix Jaitner, Cara Daggett, Johanna Gautier Morin, Ayansina Ayanlade, Maria Engström, Ilya Kalinin, Tatiana Mitrova, Oldag Caspar, Tatiana Lanshina, Polina Malysheva, Imre Szeman (see link for program).

Abstract of Alexander Klose’s paper: Whose ideology is it?
On the multiplication of ideological possibilities and contradictions in late petromodernism

When the term „petromodernity“ was coined by Canadian and US-american humanities scholars in the 2000s to name the major influence petroleum-based fuels and materials were having in the further development and expansion of the industrial civilization since the second half of the 20th century, those scholars had in mind the „American Way of Life“: a culture of exuberance based on the belief in individual freedom and market liberalism. Quite soon it became clear, though, that other petromodernities had to be taken into account as well. „Petromodernity East“, developed in the USSR and the countries of the Eastern bloc, was founded in doctrines of collectivism and planned economy. Nevertheless, it shared with its western counterpart a fundamental belief in progress as a combination of technological and social development. On the other hand, autocratic versions of petromodern developments in colonial/post-colonial extraction states like Saudi-Arabia and the Gulf States seemed to be defined by a clash with the values and habits of Western modernity, the influx of petrodollars, technologies and values dialectically strengthening anti-modern currents. Lately, under the impression of a warming climate and the Anthropocene postulate, a new dominant ideological formation has developed. It is based on the belief that the world is threatened by an end of times, the „climate catastrophe“, and in order to save the world and the benefits of the (petro-)modern civilization, it has to go „post-fossil“. In sharp contrast, in the other political camp, elites from the very centers of hyper-individualism plead to hold on to petroleum as our „companionship substance“ and restore the heydays of petromodern exuberance while at the same time giving up on core republican and democratic values like social justice, tolerance and equality for an autocratic, seemingly neo-feudal society—petroleum without modernity.

In following the historical threads of ideological formations in petromodernity, the talk tries to contribute to the work of entangling the confusing mess of competing convictions, ideas and legitimations that defines our current planetary situation.

Energy is more than the diesel in our cars, the electricity in our refrigerators, the lithium in our batteries. Energy shapes how we interact with the world. Its technologies, politics and materialities are deeply embedded in our histories, geographies, aesthetics, emotions, and visions of the good life. Energy systems are also cultural systems. In times of global heating, accelerated resource extraction, and environmental injustice, the task of transitioning towards more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable energy futures pertains to all aspects of cultural and scientific practice, and requires the perspectives and expertise of a wide variety of fields. This symposium will foreground the crucial role of the humanities and social sciences in engaging the complexities of energy transition and the legacies of petromodernity. 

With contributors from the Czech Republic, Poland, the UK, and Germany, we will introduce critical perspectives and methods on energy justice, energy literacy, energy geographies, situated transitions, and post-fossil imaginaries. JOIN US!

This event is hosted by the Chair of North American Literature and Future Studies in collaboration with the EUTOPIA Connected Community in Environmental Humanities and the TUDiSC project Transformative Placemaking for Uncertain Futures. The event will be in person and live-streamed via Zoom. Organizers: Anja Lind & Moritz Ingwersen. 

DATE & TIME
November 13, 2024, 17:00-20:30 (CET)

LOCATION (Hybrid)
ReframeSpace, Wilsdruffer Str. 16, 01067 Dresden
For a Zoom Link, please contact anja.lind@tu-dresden.de

PROGRAM
17:00-18:00 Keynote Lecture
“The Perpetual Problem: Renewable Energy Imaginaries”
–Graeme Macdonald (Warwick University)

18:30-20:30 Roundtable
“Why We Need to Dig Deep and to Map Broadly: Introducing the Atlas of Petromodernity”
–Alexander Klose (University of Halle) & Benjamin Steininger (TU Berlin/MPI of Geoanthropology, Jena)

“Engendered Energy Transition: Justice, Citizenship and Future Challenges”
–Katarzyna Iwińska (Collegium Civitas University, Warsaw)

“Crafting/Tracing Diffractive Energy Literacies – For Sol(id)arity”
–Dagmar Lorenz-Meyer (Charles University, Prague)

»Selten hat mich ein Gespräch so gefesselt – und selten eines so beunruhigt,« schreibt Joachim Telgenbücher, Ressortleiter Geschichte und Redaktionsleiter Geo Epoche in seinem Editorial (Bestellung des Hefts hier)